Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478748›Full record

ReviewCA: a cancer journal for clinicians

Urothelial carcinoma: Perioperative considerations from top to bottom.

Wesley Yip, Salvador Jaime-Casas, Anjaney Kothari, Mary Sullivan, Leslie K Ballas, Domenique Escobar, Anne K Schuckman, Jonathan E Rosenberg, Jonathan A Coleman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wesley YipDivision of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2389-3046
Salvador Jaime-CasasDivision of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-4334-1300
Anjaney KothariDivision of Urology and Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1692-2766
Mary SullivanPatient Advocate, Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Leslie K BallasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-9222-6782
Domenique EscobarUniversity of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2712-3663
Anne K SchuckmanUniversity of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jonathan E RosenbergGenitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2637-4249
Jonathan A ColemanUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6428-7835

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial carcinoma is an aggressive entity that is associated with significant morbidity, but there have been major advances in both our understanding of and treatment options for patients with this disease. In this review, the authors focus on novel therapeutic and diagnostic approaches in the perioperative setting, with an emphasis on patient-centered and individualized care. For urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB), advances in nonplatinum-based therapies, specifically immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates, have expanded the therapeutic arsenal for patients with muscle-invasive UCB in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings to improve survival outcomes. Given the significant morbidity of extirpative surgery (radical cystectomy and urinary diversion), there have also been greater efforts to evaluate bladder-sparing protocols and improve the selection of patients for surgery and their postoperative recovery. The authors review special considerations for organ-sparing surgery in females, geriatric co-management, and enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. For upper tract urothelial carcinoma, there has been increasing recognition of its unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, including risks of renal functional loss. There have been advances in molecular profiling that have demonstrated various genomic differences between upper tract urothelial carcinoma and UCB, with treatment implications. This article reviews studies evaluating perioperative care that focused on optimizing therapeutic approaches, including neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy, as well as nephron-sparing strategies in carefully selected cases.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellPerioperative CareUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantCystectomyFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyOrgan Sparing Treatmentsnonmuscle invasive bladder neoplasmsperioperative careurinary bladder neoplasmsurologic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40478748
PMCPMC12593283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.