Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478742›Full record

ArticleSTAR protocols2025

How has structuring your ideas into protocols contributed to your research progress and facilitated collaboration with others in the field?

Xi Zhang, Leila Shokri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in STAR protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xi ZhangDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada; Institute for Comparative Genomics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada. Electronic address: xi.zhang@dal.ca.
Leila ShokriCell Press, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: lshokri@cell.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stuck in the middle of a project or degree and unable to see an immediate path forward is a common experience for researchers. In this backstory, Xi shares how tidying up a step-by-step protocol for STAR Protocols has led to unforeseen progress and connections. He has collaborated with the STAR Protocols team to publish five protocols and review three manuscripts. He finds that structuring thoughts in protocol form helps build confidence and explore ideas behind the data, especially when outcomes are unexpected. Additionally, the troubleshooting process can unravel interesting biological questions. For more information on the protocols related to this backstory, please refer to Zhang et al.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorResearch DesignHumans

Identifiers

PMID40478742
PMCPMC12169760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.