ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Exploring Generative Pre-Trained Transformer-4-Vision for Nystagmus Classification: Development and Validation of a Pupil-Tracking Process.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Review of Nystagmus and Vertigo Diagnostics: From Pathological Foundations to AI-Driven Telemedicine.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- AI-based diagnostic evaluation of GPT-4o for crown-fracture detection on maxillary periapical radiographs: effects of prompt detail and customization.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Conventional nystagmus classification methods often rely on subjective observation by specialists, which is time-consuming and variable among clinicians. Recently, deep learning techniques have been used to automate nystagmus classification using convolutional and recurrent neural networks. These networks can accurately classify nystagmus patterns using video data. However, associated challenges including the need for large datasets when creating models, limited applicability to address specific image conditions, and the complexity associated with using these models. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate a novel approach for nystagmus classification that used the Generative Pre-trained Transformer 4 Vision (GPT-4V) model, which is a state-of-the-art large-scale language model with powerful image recognition capabilities. Methods: We developed a pupil-tracking process using a nystagmus-recording video and verified the optimization model's accuracy using GPT-4V classification and nystagmus recording. We tested whether the created optimization model could be evaluated in six categories of nystagmus: right horizontal, left horizontal, upward, downward, right torsional, and left torsional. The traced trajectory was input as two-dimensional coordinate data or an image, and multiple in-context learning methods were evaluated. Results: The developed model showed an overall classification accuracy of 37% when using pupil-traced images and a maximum accuracy of 24.6% when pupil coordinates were used as input. Regarding orientation, we achieved a maximum accuracy of 69% for the classification of horizontal nystagmus patterns but a lower accuracy for the vertical and torsional components. Conclusions: We demonstrated the potential of versatile vertigo management in a generative artificial intelligence model that improves the accuracy and efficiency of nystagmus classification. We also highlighted areas for further improvement, such as expanding the dataset size and enhancing input modalities, to improve classification performance across all nystagmus types. The GPT-4V model validated only for recognizing still images can be linked to video classification and proposed as a novel method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.