ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Gender-Based Differences in X Usage Among Orthopedic Surgeons at Top-Ranked US Hospitals: Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGender disparities in academic medicine persist, particularly in male-dominated fields such as orthopedic surgery. Social media platforms are reshaping academic communication, although data describing gender differences in use and engagement are limited.
objectiveThis study aims to examine gender differences by X (formerly known as Twitter) use among orthopedic surgeons, including variations in engagement, content, and influence.
methodsThis cross-sectional study evaluated publicly available data from the 2023 US News and World Report top 20 hospitals for orthopedic surgery. Demographic data, apparent gender (binary), and public X data were collected.
resultsOf 1327 orthopedic surgeons, 25% (332/1327) were on X. X users were more likely to hold leadership roles (P<.001), higher faculty appointments (P<.001), and additional advanced degrees (P=.007). Women X users (vs men) were less likely to be full professors (12% vs 20%; P=.04). While women (vs men) had similar numbers of followers, following, and posts (P>.05), women liked more posts (median 242 vs 35, P=.006). On thematic analysis of biographical content, women were more likely to mention being a parent, spouse, or their hobbies and interests (24.4% vs 12.1%; P=.048).
conclusionsOrthopedic surgeons on X were more likely to have higher academic rank, leadership titles, and dual degrees, although gender disparities persisted with women X users harboring lower rates of full professorship. Women orthopedic surgeons were more actively engaged with other posts on X. The motivation behind these trends is worthy of further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.