Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478617›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2025

Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Implementing Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.

Irene Muli, Åsa Cajander, Isabella Scandurra, Maria Hägglund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irene MuliParticipatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7622-5092
Åsa CajanderDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7472-2215
Isabella ScandurraCentre of Empirical Research in Information Systems, School of Business, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-1079
Maria HägglundParticipatory eHealth and Health Data Research Group, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6839-3651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients are increasingly being offered online record access (ORA) through patient-accessible electronic health records (PAEHRs), but implementation is often met with resistance from health care professionals (HCPs). Experiences from previous implementations may provide important insights into potential barriers and facilitators.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the implementation of the Swedish PAEHR system in primary care from the perspectives of HCPs.

methodsWe conducted 14 semistructured interviews with a diverse group of HCPs shortly after the implementation of the Swedish PAEHR system. The interviews were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and content analysis, identifying key themes related to PAEHR implementation.

resultsThe analysis identified several potential factors influencing the implementation of the Swedish PAEHR system. According to the HCPs, the PAEHR system was flawed but also flexible. The HCPs described working in a complex and imperfect organization, which nonetheless had an existing structure, support, and established communication with patients. They also described nondocumentation-related use of the electronic health record system. Moreover, they reported dealing with a complicated patient group with varying needs and high expectations. The HCPs expressed that they worked in a patient-centered way and with patient engagement. The HCPs could see both the advantages and disadvantages of the PAEHR system and had some concerns. There were mixed views of the extent of the change, where some felt patient ORA would not affect their work at all and others expected a substantial impact. Some HCPs had experience using the PAEHR system themselves, while some lacked knowledge and interest. Furthermore, the implementation process was perceived as long and uneventful, with fragmented communication, where existing communication activities were used. The HCPs also reported receiving some information and education about PAEHRs outside the organization. The HCPs had limited awareness of how patients were introduced to the PAEHR system.

conclusionsThis study underscores the importance of having a usable electronic health record system and addressing organizational issues, such as issues with the work environment, for optimal implementation of eHealth services such as the PAEHR system. It also highlights the importance of HCPs' views and experiences with their patients, and their perceptions and attitudes toward the intervention. Additionally, this study stresses the importance of effective implementation processes and communication strategies for both HCPs and patients.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelElectronic Health RecordsHealth PersonnelPatient Access to RecordsPrimary Health CareAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSwedenconsolidated framework for implementation researchimplementationpatient accessible electronic health recordprimary care

Identifiers

PMID40478617
PMCPMC12181750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.