ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
Outcomes in gestational and non-gestational choriocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study with nomograms and web tools.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChoriocarcinoma (CC), a rare and aggressive form of cancer, is composed of cytotrophoblasts and syncytiotrophoblasts. It is present in two subtypes: gestational choriocarcinoma (GCC) and non-gestational choriocarcinoma (NGCC). Recognizing the disparities between GCC and NGCC is essential for the precise staging, prognosis, and determination of the primary treatment strategy.
objectiveThis study aimed to differentiate clinical outcomes, treatment responses, and prognostic factors between GCC and NGCC and to introduce innovative tools for personalized treatment strategies.
designA retrospective cohort study with Survival Analysis and Nomogram Development.
methodsWe analyzed data from the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and identified female patients diagnosed with GCC and NGCC between 2000 and 2020. The clinicopathological features of each group were compared using the chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to assess overall survival and cancer-specific survival and to determine risk factors. The 5-year survival predicting nomogram was constructed, evaluated, and validated.
resultsThe study included 919 patients with 719 CC and 200 patients with NGCC. The NGCC group was characterized by older age, a higher proportion of married individuals, more advanced disease stages, larger tumor sizes, and a higher frequency of surgical interventions than the GCC group. NGCC was associated with worse survival rates than GCC patients.
conclusionsThis study highlights the critical role of chemotherapy in improving the survival of patients with NGCC, in contrast to its limited effect on GCC. The negative prognosis associated with radiotherapy underscores the urgent need for further investigation to optimize its use. In addition, the introduction of the first web-based survival prediction tool and predictive nomogram marked a significant advancement in personalized treatment strategies, enabling improved clinical outcomes by tailoring therapy to individual patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.