Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2025
Infants with bronchiolitis with high-flow nasal cannula in the paediatric ward. Is there a role for the ROXi (respiratory rate-oxygenation index) in predicting failure of high-flow nasal cannula?
Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The respiratory rate-oxygenation index (ROXi) has been shown to be a reliable tool for predicting the risk of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) failure in adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections. However, the usefulness of the ROXi in paediatrics remains to be shown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of the ROXi collected at the initiation of HFNC in the paediatric ward to predict HFNC failure in cases of bronchiolitis. A multicentre retrospective cohort study was performed over the epidemic seasons (October to March) from 2018 to 2023 in seven paediatric and/or neonatal conventional or intermediate care units. Patients aged 0 to 6 months with bronchiolitis hospitalised in a participating unit who received HFNC were included. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical variables were collected at admission and HFNC initiation. Initial management and its evolution were described. Patients were compared on the basis of HFNC failure, defined as the need to escalate respiratory support, either invasive or non-invasive. Multivariable regression analysis was used to determine parameters associated with HFNC failure. We included 383 infants in this multicentric study (median age 63 days [7-192]). HFNC failure was observed in 73 patients (19%); among them, 61 (80%) were transferred to the PICU. In our population, the optimal ROXi for prediction of HNFC failure was 7.6 (sensitivity 62.5% and specificity 66.8%, area under the curve (AUC): 0.647). In the multivariate analysis, explanatory variables for HFNC failure were preterm birth, younger age (under 3 months old), modified-Wood's clinical asthma score (m-WCAS) ≥ 3, and hypotonia prior to HFNC initiation.
conclusionOur study failed to demonstrate the reliability of ROXi collected at the initiation of HFNC in the paediatric ward in the case of bronchiolitis. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Over the past decade, there has been a growing interest in the use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for bronchiolitis hospitalised outside the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU). • Patients at risk of HFNC failure must be determined, and to this extent, the ability of the respiratory rate-oxygenation index (ROXi) should be further evaluated. WHAT IS NEW: • ROXi is not reliable in predicting HFNC failure in patients with bronchiolitis. • ROXi should be further prospectively evaluated, in a dynamic fashion, in association with clinical scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40478439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.