ArticleJournal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs2025
A data-driven framework for fair and efficient organ transplantation using gradient boosting and adaptive genetic allocation.
Article in Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes a comprehensive data-driven framework aimed at enhancing organ transplantation efficiency through optimized risk assessment, donor-recipient matching, and equitable organ allocation. Utilizing the gradient boosting algorithm (GBA) for risk prioritization, A* search for optimal donor location, the modified convolutional neural network-based hybrid extreme learning classifier (MCNN-HELM) model for precise matching, and an adaptive objective-weighted genetic allocation (AOWGA) algorithm, the framework addresses critical challenges in organ allocation and distribution. The experimental results indicate strong performance metrics, with the integrated system achieving an overall accuracy of 96%, allocation efficiency of 97%, and a fairness index of 0.92. The MCNN-HELM model showed a matching precision of 0.94 and an accuracy of 97.5%, outperforming existing methods. AOWGA surpassed comparative allocation methods, demonstrating an allocation efficiency of 0.96 and a positive outcome rate of 0.95. By integrating these modules, the framework not only improves organ allocation processes but also enhances survival rates and promotes ethical practices in organ distribution. By innovatively integrating these techniques, the framework reduces waiting times, improves patient outcomes, and ensures fair allocation, marking a significant advancement in addressing the persistent organ shortage and setting a new standard for ethical and efficient organ transplantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40478423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.