ReviewForensic science, medicine, and pathology2025
Advancements in craniofacial reconstruction: approaches and applications in forensics.
Review in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based 3D forensic facial reconstruction: a volumetric morphological inference approach using a skull-conditioned U-Net.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic craniofacial reconstruction deals with recreating a person's facial features from the skull by combining anatomy archeology, anthropology and statistical approaches. When DNA analysis gives inconclusive results, the investigative leads directed towards craniofacial reconstruction. This review article sheds light on advances of CFR from manual techniques of clay and tissue depth markers historical methodologies such as the American, Manchester, and Russian methods, along with forensic photography and superimposition to AI driven methods that evaluate diverse applications in forensics. The articles from PubMed, Google scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus are incorporated in relevant sections. Results of this research reveal that 3D scanning, virtual modeling, and artificially enhanced reconstruction approaches along several applications of CFR with advanced imaging techniques, such as high-resolution CT and MRI scans, identifies gaps existing in the literatures, and further recommends prospective directions to enhance scientific contributions and real-world applications i.e. mass disaster identifications or creating lifelike depictions or historical figures for museums. Critical discussion also illustrates strength and weakness of methodologies, future perspectives that are aimed at maximizing advances in digital methods i.e. holography, forensic DNA phenotyping to achieve higher accuracy, provide ethical backbone, and garner public engagement or acceptance with CFR, thus strengthening it as an indispensable aspect to forensic and anthropological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40478413What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.