ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Plasma NLRC4 and NLRP3 as potential diagnostic biomarkers for non-small cell lung cancer in pulmonary tuberculosis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- NLRC4 and NLRP3 in tissues as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer in pulmonary tuberculosis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Pyroptosis in cancer therapy: a double-edged sword for immune activation and tumor progression.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDifferentiating NSCLC from PTB remains a clinical challenge, especially when new or enlarging lung lesions appear during tuberculosis treatment. This often leads to missed surgical opportunities and delays in cancer management. Accurately identifying NSCLC within the context of PTB is essential for timely intervention.
methodsSeventy-five participants were recruited, including 25 with both PTB and NSCLC (NSCLC group), 40 age- and gender-matched PTB patients (control group), and 10 healthy volunteers. Plasma NLRC4 and NLRP3 levels were analyzed using ELISA. Statistical analyses, including t-tests, ANOVA, regression, and ROC analyses, were performed to assess biomarker levels and diagnostic utility.
resultsPlasma levels of NLRC4 and NLRP3 in the NSCLC group were significantly higher than those in the healthy volunteer group (1451.17 ± 262.92 pg/mL vs. 1161.03 ± 137.26 pg/mL, p = 0.0020; 199.91 ± 56.29 pg/mL vs. 125.13 ± 25.58 pg/mL, p = 0.0003), but significantly lower than those in the control group (1645.67 ± 229.01 pg/mL, p = 0.0034; 241.88 ± 67.24 pg/mL, p = 0.0016). In patients with concomitant PTB and NSCLC, NLRC4 levels demonstrated a significant positive correlation with age (p = 0.0139), while NLRP3 levels exhibited a significant positive correlation with vitamin B levels (p = 0.0057). The combination of NLRC4 and NLRP3 exhibited the most promising diagnostic value for NSCLC (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.769), particularly in Stage I-II (AUC: 0.718), adenocarcinoma (AUC: 0.785), and individuals aged ≤ 60 years (AUC: 0.848).
conclusionsPlasma NLRC4 and NLRP3 levels are promising biomarkers for distinguishing NSCLC in TB patients, with their combined use enhancing diagnostic accuracy in specific patient groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.