ReviewEuropean radiology2025
Recommendations on the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in the diagnosis and monitoring of common adult intracranial tumours.
Review in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary recommendations for routine follow-up of isocitrate dehydrogenase‑mutant glioma in 2026: Adapting clinical practice to the molecular era.Neuro-oncology practice · 2026Review
- Deep Learning for Automated Detection and Segmentation of Meningioma on Multiparametric MRI.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-amplified contrast enhancement in brain magnetic resonance imaging for improving image quality and lesion visualization: a prospective pilot study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Ultra-high-field 7-Tesla MRI in neuro-oncology: a narrative review of current applications and future directions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Review
- Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents in head and neck cancer diagnosis, staging, and monitoring: current applications and future perspectives.European radiology · 2026Review
- Amide proton transfer and arterial spin labeling for non-invasive molecular stratification of glioma: a multi-dataset imaging biomarker study.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) have been indispensable in intracranial tumour imaging, particularly for detecting and characterising malignant lesions, as well as assessing treatment response and disease progression. However, growing concerns about gadolinium deposition in the central nervous system and its environmental impact have prompted a re-evaluation of its use, particularly in the management of benign or stable lesions. This review examines the role of GBCAs in imaging the most common types of intracranial tumours, including gliomas, meningiomas, pituitary adenomas, cranial nerve tumours, and metastases. Recent advancements in high-field MRI scanners and the increasing adoption of 3D T2-weighted sequences, which provide excellent soft-tissue contrast, offer significant opportunities to minimise or eliminate GBCA use. Moreover, advanced MRI methods, such as arterial spin labelling for perfusion imaging and the obtention of synthetic images, have emerged as non-invasive alternatives that further enable contrast-free imaging. Finally, the development of ultra-high-relaxivity contrast agents offers the potential to reduce doses when GBCAs are required. While GBCAs remain essential for imaging certain high-grade gliomas and complex tumour cases, alternative imaging techniques can often replace them in many benign or stable lesions, ensuring diagnostic accuracy and prioritising patient safety. This review highlights strategies to optimise GBCA use, focusing on reducing reliance on GBCAs across different intracranial tumour types. KEY POINTS: Question Current neuro-oncological imaging protocols require refinement to reduce unnecessary gadolinium exposure, mitigate tissue deposition and environmental impact, and maintain diagnostic accuracy. Findings Findings reveal that alternative imaging techniques, including high-field MRI and non-contrast protocols, can reduce GBCAs usage in benign and stable brain tumours. Clinical relevance Minimising gadolinium exposure by reducing or avoiding GBCAs in intracranial tumour imaging effectively mitigates CNS gadolinium retention, lowers environmental impact and toxicity risks, while preserving diagnostic accuracy, enhancing patient safety, and optimising clinical workflows, especially for benign or stable tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40478344What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.