ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Predictors of cigarette smoking frequency among European adolescents aged 13-15: the critical role of parental smoking and age of initiation.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alcohol and Energy Drink Use Among Adolescents and Young Adults: Insights from the ALIMA Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Associations of parental smoking throughout childhood with adolescent smoking and vaping: Mediation via adolescent substance use attitudes.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2026Article
- Neuroimmune regulation of post-traumatic bone regeneration: focus on inflammatory switching and functional recovery.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Mediation analysis investigating the mechanisms of two school-based smoking prevention interventions in adolescents from Northern Ireland and Bogotá.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This cross-sectional study investigated predictors of cigarette smoking frequency among European adolescents aged 13-15, focusing on parental smoking, age of initiation, and socioeconomic factors. Data were derived from the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (2020-2023) in eight European countries. Smoking frequency was classified as infrequent (< 1/day), daily light (1/day), moderate (2-5/day), and heavy (> 5/day). Individual variables (age, pocket money, age at initiation, tobacco experimentation), familial factors (parental smoking, parental education), and country-level factors (PPP-adjusted cigarette prices, income inequality) were analyzed using sex-stratified multilevel ordinal logistic regression models, accounting for clustering at the country and school levels. Notable country- and gender-specific variations in smoking prevalence were observed. Notably, Bulgaria and Albania exhibited the highest prevalence of heavy smoking (> 5 cigarettes/day). Overall, girls were more likely to be smokers, while boys tended to be heavy smokers. Older age, early initiation (< 10 years), and tobacco experimentation significantly increased smoking frequency in both sexes. For males, paternal smoking predicted higher frequency (OR = 2.06), whereas maternal smoking appeared protective (OR = 0.67). Among females, maternal smoking and dual parental smoking were associated with increased frequency. Higher pocket money was also associated with smoking frequency, while cigarette affordability showed a marginal inverse association in males. Our findings underscore the critical role of early smoking initiation and parental influence in determining smoking frequency among European adolescents. Tailored interventions addressing familial risk factors and socioeconomic determinants are essential to curb heavy smoking in this vulnerable population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.