ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025
Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for malignant ovarian tumors: a single-institution study.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Patients with Gynecological Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Fertility-Sparing Management in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Indications and Limitations of vNOTES for the Surgical Staging of Early-Stage Ovarian Cancer: A Narrative Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Application of "4-P" port anchoring in transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES): technique and initial feasibility.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is an established access technique for gynecological surgeries, but its utility in ovarian cancer surgery is not well-established.
methodsThis was a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vNOTES surgery and had malignant tumors arising from or involving the ovary on final histology. Preoperative, intraoperative and immediate postoperative outcomes were collected. Oncological outcomes of recurrence and overall survival were also analyzed.
resultsA total of 19 patients were included for analysis: 4 patients had fertility-sparing surgery, 12 had primary staging surgery, 1 had restaging surgery and 2 patients had interval debulking surgery. In the primary staging surgery group, hysterectomy was performed in all patients, omentectomy in a third of the patients, and pelvic lymph node dissection in a quarter of the patients. Only one intraoperative complication of high blood loss was seen, in a patient who was a known hemophilia carrier. Pain scores were mostly zero at 12 and 24 h post-operatively, and most patients were discharged on postoperative day 1 or 2. There were no readmissions for postoperative complications or disease recurrence within 30 days. Median follow-up time was 26.4 months in the whole cohort (interquartile range, 6.3 to 30 months), during which there were 4 cases of recurrence and no deaths.
conclusionsvNOTES is a feasible and versatile technique for ovarian cancer surgery, with low rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications, short length of stay, and favorable short- to medium-term oncological outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.