ArticleChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Underfunding of surgical services in sarcoma treatment: a retrospective analysis of inpatient treatment costs at a university sarcoma center].
Article in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveSoft tissue sarcomas are rare heterogeneous tumors that require extensive treatment and should only be treated in specialized sarcoma centers. Surgical R0 resection with negative margins is one of the most important positive predictors of disease-specific survival. Comprehensive healthcare economic analyses of inpatient treatment costs are largely lacking but are essential to ensure sustainable and cost-effective care.
methodsThis retrospective single center study analyzed the inpatient costs of 112 sarcoma cases treated at this university tumor center between 2020 and 2022. The statistical analyses were performed to identify variables that influence case underfunding. Additionally, the revenue distribution was examined with respect to the frequency and extent of underfunding using the cost matrix of the Institute for the Remuneration System in Hospitals (InEK).
resultsA negative revenue balance was observed in 66.1% of cases, leading to a total deficit exceeding € 222,000. Significant predictors of underfunding included prolonged operation times, duration of intensive care stay and exceeding the average length of stay. The highest negative revenues were identified in the categories of "infrastructure costs", "medical technical services" and "operating room costs".
conclusionThe results reveal significant underfunding of surgical sarcoma treatment in a specialized university sarcoma center. Adjustments to diagnosis-related groups (DRG)-based reimbursement are urgently needed to ensure the economic sustainability of care while safeguarding patient safety, academic training and making clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40478306What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.