ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Virtual Reality in Neonatal Ductal Stenting: A New Era in Preprocedural Planning for Ductus Arteriosus Stenting in Complex Congenital Heart Defects with Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive Performance and Rater Reliability of CT-derived Virtual Reality Models for PDA Stent Planning in Patients with Ductal-Dependent Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Technical Feasibility of Virtual Reality-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography: A Retrospective Analysis of a Novel Imaging Approach for Interventional Procedures in the Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Pre-procedural three-dimensional computed tomography vs. angiographic assessment for patent ductus arteriosus stenting: a comparative analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Transforming Care in Congenital Heart Disease: The Role of Extended Reality in Family and Trainee Education and Procedural Planning.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Ductal Stenting in Double Aortic Arch with Tetralogy of Fallot and Pulmonary Atresia: Challenges and Imaging Aspects.Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ductus arteriosus (DA) stenting is a well-established interventional alternative to surgical systemic-to-pulmonary shunts in neonates with congenital heart defects and ductal-dependent pulmonary circulation (DDPC). While it avoids sternotomy and cardiopulmonary bypass, the procedure remains technically demanding, especially in cases involving tortuous or misaligned ductal anatomy. Such anatomical complexity is associated with increased procedural difficulty and a higher rate of reinterventions. Although echocardiography, computed tomography (CT), and angiography remain key imaging modalities, they may be limited in providing comprehensive spatial context. Virtual reality (VR) has recently emerged as a promising tool that enables interactive 3D visualisation of cardiovascular structures and may enhance preprocedural assessment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of CT-derived VR-based 3D modelling for preprocedural planning in neonates undergoing DA stenting for DDPC. The study compared VR-derived anatomical and procedural assessments with conventional angiographic imaging. Between March 2021 and August 2023, six neonates with DDPC underwent preprocedural contrast-enhanced CT and were included in this single-centre retrospective study. Three additional patients referred for DA stenting without CT were excluded. Dedicated VR software (VMersive, Poland) was used to automatically generate interactive 3D models from CT datasets without manual segmentation. The models were evaluated using immersive VR headsets and controller-based tools for precise anatomical assessment. DA morphology, tortuosity classification, total ductal length [L1], straight-line distance [L2], curvature index (CI), optimal fluoroscopic projection, and vascular access were analysed in VR and compared with angiographic data. Paired t-tests were used for statistical comparison, with significance set at p < 0.05. All six VR models were successfully created in under 5 min. Morphological and tortuosity classification: VR-based assessments were consistent with angiographic classification (Type I-III), confirming reliability. Length and curvature: VR-derived [L1] values were significantly longer than angiographic measurements (mean: 28.93 mm vs. 24.14 mm; p = 0.038). Curvature index was significantly higher in VR (mean: 0.46 vs. 0.29; p < 0.001), especially in Type III ducts, suggesting that angiography underestimates vascular tortuosity. Projection planning: Median angular deviation between VR-recommended and final procedural projections was 12° (range: 6-30°, p = 0.259). In cases requiring multiple contrast injections, final projections closely matched VR suggestions, indicating VR's potential to reduce radiation exposure and procedural time. Vascular access: VR-predicted access matched initial operator choice in 3/6 cases (50%), rising to 5/6 (83%) when reinterventions were included. Adjacent structures: VR allowed simultaneous visualisation of DA and adjacent thoracic structures. In patients with anomalous pulmonary venous return, VR clarified spatial relationships and potential compression risk. Additionally, in one case, a persistent vertical vein was identified, guiding a rare, combined intervention strategy. VR-based 3D modelling from CT data are a feasible and effective tool for preprocedural planning in DA stenting. It provides accurate spatial insight into ductal anatomy, curvature, projection alignment, and access routes. VR enhances anatomical understanding, supports multidisciplinary planning, and may reduce procedural uncertainty, particularly in complex neonatal interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.