Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40478060›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Friedens- und Konfliktforschung2022

Using digitally mediated methods in sensitive contexts: a threat analysis and critical reflection on data security, privacy, and ethical concerns in the case of Afghanistan.

Laura Gianna Guntrum, Benjamin Güldenring, Franz Kuntke, Christian Reuter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Gianna GuntrumScience and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Pankratiusstraße 2, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9540-2488
Benjamin GüldenringSecure Identity, Department of Computer Science, Freie Universität Berlin, Schwendenerstraße 1, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Franz KuntkeScience and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Pankratiusstraße 2, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7656-5919
Christian ReuterScience and Technology for Peace and Security (PEASEC), Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Darmstadt, Pankratiusstraße 2, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1920-038X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the lack of empirical examples of how research can be conducted via digital means in sensitive contexts, this paper provides a threat model using Afghanistan, where the Taliban took power in August 2021, as an example. Both technical and non-technical research-related risks are analyzed, paying attention to research ethics, data security, and privacy. We argue that any threat model and risk analysis is highly context-dependent. Our analysis reveals that in certain research processes, human security does not necessarily coincide with data security and that an ambivalence exists between privacy and usability. In addition to the concrete threat analysis, the paper identifies some general technical solutions (e.g., encryption methods, communication software) for different research steps to foster secure and ethically justifiable research.

Indexed as

Digital research designIT securityResearch ethicsSecure communicationTechnical peace and conflict researchThreat modeling

Identifiers

PMID40478060
PMCPMC9830610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.