ArticleJournal of building engineering2022
Multi-objective performance assessment of HVAC systems and physical barriers on COVID-19 infection transmission in a high-speed train.
Article in Journal of building engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D modelling and simulation of thermal effects and dispersion of particles carrying infectious respiratory agents in a railway transport coach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- COVID-19 transmission and control in land public transport: A literature review.Fundamental research · 2024Review
- Influence of natural ventilation design on the dispersion of pathogen-laden droplets in a coach bus.The Science of the total environment · 2023Article
- Influences of obstacle factors on the transmission trends of respiratory infectious diseases in indoor public places.Journal of building engineering · 2023Article
- A numerical approach for preventing the dispersion of infectious disease in a meeting room.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- An evaluation of the risk of airborne transmission of COVID-19 on an inter-city train carriage.Indoor air · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation was performed to model and study the transmission risk associated with cough-related SARS-CoV-2 droplets in a real-world high-speed train (HST). In this study, the evaporating of the droplets was considered. Simulation data were post-processed to assess the fraction of the particles deposited on each passenger's face and body, suspended in air, and escaped from exhausts. Firstly, the effects of temperature, relative humidity, ventilation rate, injection source, exhausts' location and capacity, and adding the physical barriers on evaporation and transport of respiratory droplets are investigated in long distance HST. The results demonstrate that overall, 6-43% of the particles were suspended in the cabin after 2.7 min, depending on conditions, and 3-58% of the particles were removed from the cabin in the same duration. Use of physical barriers and high ventilation rate is therefore recommended for both personal and social protection. We found more exhaust capacity and medium relative humidity to be effective in reducing the particles' transmission potential across all studied scenarios. The results indicate that reducing ventilation rate and exhaust capacity, increased aerosols shelf time and dispersion throughout the cabin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.