Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477924›Full record

ArticleIntelligent systems with applications2022

The fluctuation analysis of public opinion energy: Modeling social group opinion base on the event of social networks.

Yayong Shi, Jianpeng Qi, Rui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Intelligent systems with applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yayong ShiSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing 100083, China.
Jianpeng QiSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing 100083, China.
Rui WangSchool of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing (USTB), Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the period of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), millions of people participate in the discussion of COVID-19 on the Internet, which can easily trigger public opinion and threaten social stability. To find out the relationship between the intergroup variability in numbers and perspectives and the dynamic change of the number of infected people, this paper defines the public focus level to quantify the level of attention of people to the information related to an epidemic situation, and the POF model based on the level of epidemic focus is proposed. In this paper, we have carried out simulation experiments in small-world networks and scale-free networks, respectively, to explore the relationship between the model parameters and the spreading range and speed of each population. Furthermore, the paper also analyzed all the original microblog posts published by the People's Daily from January 14, 2020, to February 12, 2020, and compared the data simulated by the POF model with the real data from the People's Daily, the simulation data and the real data can be well fitted to prove the reliability of the model.

Indexed as

Computer simulationCOVID-19Information spreadingPublic focus levelSpreading dynamics

Identifiers

PMID40477924
PMCPMC8901231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.