Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477896›Full record

ReviewFood engineering reviews2023

Processing Technologies for the Extraction of Value-Added Bioactive Compounds from Tea.

Sonali Raghunath, Sravanthi Budaraju, Seyed Mohammad Taghi Gharibzahedi, Mohamed Koubaa, Shahin Roohinejad, Kumar Mallikarjunan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food engineering reviews, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Evaluation of Immunoprotective Activities of White Button Mushroom (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Green chemistry : an international journal and green chemistry resource : GC · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sonali RaghunathDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA.
Sravanthi BudarajuDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA.
Seyed Mohammad Taghi GharibzahediInstitute of Chemistry, Technical University of Berlin, Straße Des 17 Juni 124, 10623 Berlin, Germany.
Mohamed KoubaaESCOM, UTC, EA 4297 TIMR, 1 Allée du Réseau Jean-Marie Buckmaster, 60200 Compiègne, France.
Shahin RoohinejadDivision of Food and Nutrition, Burn and Wound Healing Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kumar MallikarjunanDepartment of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6402-8860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tea (

Indexed as

BioactivityExtractionMicrowavePhenolic compoundsPressurized liquidPulsed electric fieldSupercritical CO2Tea (Camellia sinensis)Ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID40477896
PMCPMC9961310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.