Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477887›Full record

ArticleTrends in psychology2022

Follow-up Evaluation of Psychotherapy Protocols for Women with a History of Intimate Partner Violence: Scoping Review.

Laura Nichele Foschiera, Melina Friedrich Dupont, Luísa Fernanda Habigzang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura Nichele FoschieraPontifícia Universidade Católica Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre/Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3544-9919
Melina Friedrich DupontPontifícia Universidade Católica Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre/Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-6514
Luísa Fernanda HabigzangPontifícia Universidade Católica Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre/Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0262-0356

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the methodological aspects, main results, and limitations of the follow-up evaluations of psychotherapeutic interventions for women with a history of intimate partner violence (IPV). A search was carried out in the SciELO, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases, using the descriptors: ("clinical trial" OR "therapy" OR "psychotherapy" OR "psychological treatment") AND ("violence" OR "mistreatment" OR "intimate partner violence" OR "domestic violence" OR "conjugal violence") AND ("women"). 1480 articles were retrieved and after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 articles composed the final sample. The majority of the follow-up assessments were carried out through the reapplication of the basic instruments, with the period of 3 months post-intervention being the most used. Sample losses were identified in all the studies analyzed. The limitations and difficulties were associated with the complexity of the target population. This review identified the importance of the follow-up evaluations and the need to adapt them to ensure the effectiveness of the interventions, aiming to reach a larger number of women, strengthen protective aspects, and prevent revictimization.

Indexed as

Clinical trial protocolsFollow-up studiesIntimate partner violencePsychological interventionsWomen

Identifiers

PMID40477887
PMCPMC8612624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.