Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477861›Full record

ArticleInternational journal on interactive design and manufacturing2023

Prediction performance analysis of neural network models for an electrical discharge turning process.

Kumaresh Dey, Kanak Kalita, Shankar Chakraborty

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal on interactive design and manufacturing, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kumaresh DeyProduction Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.
Kanak KalitaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology, Avadi, India.
Shankar ChakrabortyProduction Engineering Department, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In many of the modern-day manufacturing industries, electrical discharge machining (EDM) now appears as an effective non-traditional material removal process for generating intricate shape geometries on various hard-to-cut work materials to meet the ever-increasing demands of higher dimensional accuracy and better surface quality. Development of an appropriate prediction model for any of the EDM processes is quite difficult due to complex material removal mechanism, and dynamic interactions between the input parameters and responses. To address the problem, this paper proposes development and deployment of five neural network models, i.e. feed forward neural network, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network, general regression neural network and long short term memory-based recurrent neural network as effective prediction tools for an electrical discharge turning (EDT) process. The EDT is a variant of EDM process involving removal of material from cylindrical workpieces. The input parameters for the considered EDT process are magnetic field, pulse current, pulse duration and angular velocity, whereas, the responses are material removal rate and overcut. Several statistical error metrics, like

Indexed as

Electrical discharge turningNeural networkPredictionResponseStatistical error metric

Identifiers

PMID40477861
PMCPMC9371380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.