Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477710›Full record

ArticleEmployee responsibilities and rights journal2023

Internal Corporate Policy: CSR and Employee Satisfaction.

Boris Miethlich, Maria Beliakova, Liudmila Voropaeva, Olga Ustyuzhina, Tatiana Yurieva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Employee responsibilities and rights journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Boris MiethlichDepartment of Business Studies, IIC University of Technology, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Maria BeliakovaDepartment of Management of Sport and Tourism Industry, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Liudmila VoropaevaDepartment of Project and Program Management, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russian Federation.
Olga UstyuzhinaDepartment of Economics and Management, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Elabuga, Russian Federation.
Tatiana YurievaDepartment of Management of Sport and Tourism Industry, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow, Russian Federation.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, society has undergone significant changes with implications for employee values and job satisfaction. As a reflection of social needs, corporate social practice is also changing compared to before the pandemic. This paper examines the perception of corporate social practices by personnel and their impact on staff satisfaction. The empirical study carried out in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan allowed the authors to identify social practices that influence the level of personnel satisfaction with professional activity before and after the pandemic. The research determined general tendencies and differences in the perception of social practices with the most significant personnel satisfaction in the period before and after the pandemic. The authors also developed recommendations that should be taken into account when forming corporate social practices. The study's novelty is the investigation of an empirical relationship between the levels of satisfaction with professional activity and implemented social practices in the period before and after the pandemic. The research found that the tendencies in Russia and Kazakhstan are similar to the global trends. Employees before the pandemic were highly satisfied with their activities and corporate social responsibility practices. After the pandemic, when society is disconnected and individualized, employees are focused on material security, and social practices have no significant influence on staff satisfaction. The paper offers recommendations for companies to implement appropriate social practices for the common interests of employers and staff.

Indexed as

Corporate social responsibilityCOVID-19 pandemicMultilevel dependencySocial developmentSociety

Identifiers

PMID40477710
PMCPMC9108135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.