Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477630›Full record

ArticleJournal of building engineering2021

Energy performance and indoor airflow analysis of a healthcare ward designed with resource conservation objectives.

Pranaynil Saikia, Dibakar Rakshit, Ramesh Narayanaswamy, Fujen Wang, Udayraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of building engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pranaynil SaikiaDepartment of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India.
Dibakar RakshitDepartment of Energy Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, India.
Ramesh NarayanaswamySchool of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Australia.
Fujen WangDepartment of Refrigeration, Air-Conditioning and Energy Engineering, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taichung City, Taiwan.
UdayrajDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the outbreak of COVID-19, the urgency of wide-scale healthcare infrastructure development has been felt globally for human survival. To accommodate a large infected population, copious wards are to be built within the prevalent constraints of land, power and material availability. This study designs a two-bed modular healthcare ward which is shrunk in size to minimize the requirement of space and other construction commodities such as materials, labour and power. Additionally, HVAC energy usage is accounted for conservation. The health safety and thermal comfort of occupants are regulated by monitoring indoor environment attributes while pushing towards a resource-efficient structure. Two popular envelope thermal retrofits viz. phase change material and thermal insulation are tested to conceive gains in terms of improved energy performance of the ward. Various ward designs contest with their energy performance and occupant's health safety and comfort characteristics in a multicriteria decision making process for delivering the most favourable solution. Subsequently, the most suitable solution is offered by a design involving thermal insulation retrofit with 8 ACH fresh air supply rate and 26°C inlet air temperature. The proposed design can support developing nations to contrive quick response to pandemic outbreaks with reduced construction (cost, time) and energy loads.

Indexed as

Airborne infectionCOVID-19Healthcare wardHeat gainIndoor airflowThermal comfort

Identifiers

PMID40477630
PMCPMC8438806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.