Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477571›Full record

ArticleJournal of the knowledge economy2022

Does Innovation Make Nations More Healthy? Evidence from Developing and Developed Countries.

Tonmoy Chatterjee, Nilendu Chatterjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the knowledge economy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tonmoy ChatterjeeDepartment of Economics, Ananda Chandra College, Jalpaiguri, India.
Nilendu ChatterjeeDepartment of Economics, Bankim Sardar College, South 24 Paraganas, Andhla, 743329 West Bengal India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our main contribution in this paper consists of analyzing long-run interactions between health status and innovation in the form of R&D activities accounting for possible economic development. For this purpose, we are based on a sample of fifteen developed and fifteen developing countries across the world during the period 2000-2017. As the principal interest is on the long-run effect, it is not essential to be concerned about the variable lags through which innovation will impact health. Therefore, to get the asymptotically efficient long-run impact of innovation on health, we have introduced both dynamic OLS and fully modified OLS for developed countries. Further, we have employed a technique based on panel ARDL methods for developing countries which deals with the stationary series problem of different orders to monitor possible association between population health and innovation in the long-run horizon. Our empirical results support long- and short-run causality running from R&D activities to health in all developed countries, whereas the just-mentioned causality prevails only in the long-run in case of developing countries. Finally, to check the robustness of the said association, we have implemented neural network-based NARX technique to validate the prediction of health status on the basis of R&D activities, and eventually, NARX supports our hypothesis in case of long-run through back-propagation. Policy recommendation includes the encouragement of more R&D activities and R&D-related policy implementation in both developed and developing nations to opt for better health status.

Indexed as

Health statusNARXPanel autoregressive distributed lagPanel cointegrationPanel Granger causalityR&D investment

Identifiers

PMID40477571
PMCPMC8609178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.