ArticleJournal of safety science and resilience = An quan ke xue yu ren xing (Ying wen)2021
Constructing public health evidence knowledge graph for decision-making support from COVID-19 literature of modelling study.
Article in Journal of safety science and resilience = An quan ke xue yu ren xing (Ying wen), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A review on knowledge graphs for healthcare: Resources, applications, and promises.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2025Review
- User Centered Rare Disease Clinical Trial Knowledge Graph (RCTKG).Studies in health technology and informatics · 2024Article
- Pandemic prevention and personality psychology: Gender differences in preventive health behaviors during COVID-19 and the roles of agreeableness and conscientiousness.Journal of safety science and resilience = An quan ke xue yu ren xing (Ying wen) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The needs of mitigating COVID-19 epidemic prompt policymakers to make public health-related decision under the guidelines of science. Tremendous unstructured COVID-19 publications make it challenging for policymakers to obtain relevant evidence. Knowledge graphs (KGs) can formalize unstructured knowledge into structured form and have been used in supporting decision-making recently. Here, we introduce a novel framework that can extract the COVID-19 public health evidence knowledge graph (CPHE-KG) from papers relating to a modelling study. We screen out a corpus of 3096 COVID-19 modelling study papers by performing a literature assessment process. We define a novel annotation schema to construct the COVID-19 modelling study-related IE dataset (CPHIE). We also propose a novel multi-tasks document-level information extraction model SS-DYGIE++ based on the dataset. Leveraging the model on the new corpus, we construct CPHE-KG containing 60,967 entities and 51,140 relations. Finally, we seek to apply our KG to support evidence querying and evidence mapping visualization. Our SS-DYGIE++(SpanBERT) model has achieved a F1 score of 0.77 and 0.55 respectively in document-level entity recognition and coreference resolution tasks. It has also shown high performance in the relation identification task. With evidence querying, our KG can present the dynamic transmissions of COVID-19 pandemic in different countries and regions. The evidence mapping of our KG can show the impacts of variable non-pharmacological interventions to COVID-19 pandemic. Analysis demonstrates the quality of our KG and shows that it has the potential to support COVID-19 policy making in public health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.