Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477433›Full record

ArticleGlobal journal of flexible systems management2021

Explaining the Voluntary Compliance to COVID-19 Measures: An Extrapolation on the Gender Perspective.

Widya Paramita, Rokhima Rostiani, Sari Winahjoe, Amin Wibowo, Risa Virgosita, Handini Audita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global journal of flexible systems management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perceptions of and adherence to early COVID-19-related restrictions and associations with substance use among youth in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Widya ParamitaDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Rokhima RostianiDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-4075-2528
Sari WinahjoeDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Amin WibowoDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7459-7530
Risa VirgositaDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Handini AuditaDepartment of Management, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The discourse of gender amidst the COVID-19 pandemic had been a big fuss. Amongst the discussions is the gender-related responses to COVID-19 that generally assume females to better respond to COVID-19 than males. Despite the converging assumptions, previous studies tend to conceptualize gender as binary biological sex, and consequently, there is little understanding of the gender-COVID-19 measures compliance relationship. By taking gender as a multidimensional perspective, this research aims to examine the relationship between sex, gender psychology, and gender-role with voluntary compliance to COVID-19 measures as well as the moderating role of situational aspects that can activate individuals' responses toward COVID-19. A survey had been conducted in Indonesia, as Indonesia represents a country with relaxed COVID-19 restrictions making voluntary compliance is deemed important. Consistent with our predictions and previous studies, females tend to better comply with COVID-19 when gender is treated as dichotomous sex. However, a closer look at the gender dimensions revealed that gender psychology (feminine vs masculine) and gender-role (traditional vs egalitarian) provide a better explanation of the specific compliance behaviour toward COVID-19 measures. Interestingly, although situational pathogen avoidance (SPA) directly leads to adherence to several compliance behaviours, it does not moderate the four compliance behaviour of COVID-19 measures. Theoretical and practical contributions are further discussed.

Indexed as

COVID-19Gender psychologyGender-roleSexSituational pathogen avoidance (SPA)Voluntary compliance

Identifiers

PMID40477433
PMCPMC7931786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.