Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477342›Full record

ReviewFood production, processing and nutrition2021

Biscuits: a systematic review and meta-analysis of improving the nutritional quality and health benefits.

Mahamadé Goubgou, Laurencia T Songré-Ouattara, Fabrice Bationo, Hagrétou Lingani-Sawadogo, Yves Traoré, Aly Savadogo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food production, processing and nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characterization of Black Lime (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Valorization of Tomato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Oyster Mushroom (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. How to measure consumer's inconsistency in sensory testing?Current research in food science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahamadé GoubgouDoctoral School of Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry and Immunology (LABIA), University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID 0000-0001-5920-2254
Laurencia T Songré-OuattaraDepartment of Food Technology (DTA), Research Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (IRSAT), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-2593
Fabrice BationoDepartment of Food Technology (DTA), Research Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (IRSAT), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Hagrétou Lingani-SawadogoDepartment of Food Technology (DTA), Research Institute of Applied Sciences and Technology (IRSAT), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Yves TraoréDoctoral School of Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry and Immunology (LABIA), University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2015-0068
Aly SavadogoDoctoral School of Sciences and Technology, Laboratory of Applied Biochemistry and Immunology (LABIA), University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9090-290X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biscuits are ready-to-eat foods that are traditionally prepared mainly with wheat flour, fat, and sugar. Recently, biscuits' technologies have been rapidly developed to improve their nutritional properties. This study aimed to determine the strategies of improving the nutritional quality of biscuits and the potential health benefits associated with them. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, including articles on biscuits improved by technological processes and raw materials variation. Studies were searched from Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science published between 1997 and 2020, in English and French. The meta-analysis was performed using RStudio software, version 4.0.4 to classify the biscuits. One hundred and seven eligible articles were identified. Rice, pea, potato, sorghum, buckwheat, and flaxseed flours were respectively the most found substitutes to wheat flour. But the meta-analysis shown that the copra and foxtail millet biscuit fortified with amaranth, the wheat biscuits fortified with okra, and rice biscuits fortified with soybeans had a high protein content. These biscuits therefore have a potential to be used as complementary foods. The substitution of sugar and fat by several substitutes lead to a decrease in carbohydrates, fat, and energy value. It has also brought about an increase in other nutrients such as dietary fiber, proteins/amino acids, fatty acids, and phenolic compounds. Among the sugar and fat substitutes, stevia and inulin were respectively the most used. Regarding the use of biscuits in clinical trials, they were mainly used for addressing micronutrient deficiency and for weight loss.

Indexed as

BiscuitHealth benefitsNutritionTechnology

Identifiers

PMID40477342
PMCPMC8483942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.