ArticlePostdigital science and education2022
Postdigital Ecopedagogies: Genealogies, Contradictions, and Possible Futures.
Article in Postdigital science and education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The algorithmic self: reimagining conscious leadership in posthuman education: toward a posthuman ethics of educational awareness.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Postdigital health practices: new directions in medical humanities.Medical humanities · 2023Article
- Understanding Digital Inequality: A Theoretical Kaleidoscope.Postdigital science and education · 2023Article
- The role of teachers in a sustainable university: from digital competencies to postdigital capabilities.Educational technology research and development : ETR & D · 2023Article
- Postdigital Research: Genealogies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Postdigital science and education · 2022Article
- Postdigital Applied Systems Science Education: Toward an Integral Framework, Curriculum, and Pedagogy.Postdigital science and education · 2022Article
- The Postdigital-Biodigital Revolution.Postdigital science and education · 2022Article
- Futures Studies, Mobilities, and the Postdigital Condition: Contention or Complement.Postdigital science and education · 2022Article
- Virtue Signaling: Problematizing Creative Labor Within Knowledge Socialism.Postdigital science and education · 2021Article
- Biology, Information, Society.Postdigital science and education · 2021Article
- Networked Learning in 2021: A Community Definition.Postdigital science and education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper charts some genealogies, challenges, and directions for experimenting with the utopic postdigital ecopedagogies demanded by our present (post)pandemic reality. These are messianic-rather than prophetic-utopias that exist not as proclamations or programmes for a distant future but as potentialities immanent in the irreducible excess of the present. While their roots most clearly emanate from the Freirean-inspired ecopedagogy movement, we conceptualize ecopedagogies instead as educational forms that emerge from, negotiate, debate, produce, resist, and/or overcome the shifting and expansive postdigital ecosystems from and to which we write and think. These are expansive ecosystems of humans, postdigital machines, nonhuman animals, minerals, objects, and more; ecosystems that are overdetermined by new forms of ontological hierarchies and capitalism, imperialism, and settler-colonialism. By charting some of the potential lineages, directions, contradictions, and challenges-and by proposing potential lines of educational praxis-we lay a basis for reinvigorated fields of inquiry that moves beyond the existing postdigital literature on the current pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.