Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477284›Full record

ReviewPravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022

[Health literacy in the digital age].

Doris Schaeffer, Svea Gille

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Attitudes of dermatological patients towards digital health interventions: a cross-sectional survey and cluster analysis.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  2. [Professional Health Literacy Among Midwives - Findings from a Standardised Online Survey Conducted in Bavaria].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Article
  3. [Relevance of eHealth Literacy (eHL) for Health Services Research and Practice - Part I].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. [Professional Health Literacy of General Practitioners - Results of the HLS-PROF].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2025
    Article
  6. [Digital Health Literacy of the Population in Germany: Results of the HLS-GER 2].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  7. Teaching Digital Medicine in a Virtual Classroom: Impacts on Student Mindset and Competencies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Doris SchaefferFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung (IZGK), Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Deutschland.
Svea GilleFakultät für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Interdisziplinäres Zentrum für Gesundheitskompetenzforschung (IZGK), Universität Bielefeld, Universitätsstr. 25, 33615 Bielefeld, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the digital transformation and the increase in digital health information, the opportunities for health promotion and disease prevention are also increasing. At the same time, the demands on dealing with health information and thus for (digital) health literacy are also increasing. However, existing studies show that a large part of the population in Germany is not adequately health literate, which points to a great need for political action. Objectives: This article therefore examines the extent to which health literacy has been successfully established as an issue and as a potential new policy area in Germany. Materials and methods: Following the discussion on policy analysis, the paper considers five criteria ((1.) problem perception and agenda-setting, (2.) consensus on definition and objectives, (3.) empirical evidence, (4.) willingness to act and change, (5.) level of resources) against which it attempts to assess the development of health literacy as a new policy area. Results: Overall, it can be shown that health literacy has undergone a rapid career as a topic in Germany and is becoming increasingly relevant both socially and politically. In recent years, important steps have been taken in establishing health literacy as a policy area, which have also attracted international attention. However, too little attention has been paid to digitalization and to linking the two discussions and developments, which have been conducted separately so far. To anchor health literacy sustainably as a policy field, several challenges have to be addressed. Conclusions: The importance of health literacy in the digital age is greater than ever. Meeting these challenges will therefore be an important task in the future.

Indexed as

Digital transformationHealth informationHealth literacyNeed for actionPolicy process

Identifiers

PMID40477284
PMCPMC8247623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.