Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40477250›Full record

ArticlePravention und Gesundheitsforderung2022

[Big Data in health promotion and prevention].

Julia Spranger, Marlen Niederberger

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. [Prevention and cost control in the German healthcare sector].Pravention und Gesundheitsforderung · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia SprangerForschungsmethoden in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention, Pädagogische Hochschule Schwäbisch Gmünd, Oberbettringer Straße 200, 73525 Schwäbisch Gmünd, Deutschland.ORCID 0000-0002-1802-8138
Marlen NiederbergerForschungsmethoden in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention, Pädagogische Hochschule Schwäbisch Gmünd, Oberbettringer Straße 200, 73525 Schwäbisch Gmünd, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The use of large and diverse amounts of data (Big Data) can lead to the gaining of health-related insights. The relevance is underlined by current challenges, for example in connection with digitization, health care in exceptional situations and the increasing importance of personalization processes in health research. The potential of Big Data for research on vulnerable groups is controversial, but particularly relevant against the background of relatively persistent socially determined health inequalities. Objectives: The study examines how experts in the field of health data analysis assess the potential of Big Data in health promotion and prevention, especially for research on vulnerable groups. Materials and methods: In a Delphi study, experts were surveyed in two rounds using an online questionnaire to identify consensus and dissent on the potential of Big Data. Results and conclusions: From the experts' point of view, Big Data holds potential for health promotion and prevention, especially in the clinical setting and in the personalization of health-related measures. People with rare diseases and older people could benefit from Big Data analyses, for example through faster diagnostic processes or personalized digital health applications. The experts disagreed on the extent to which research institutions, health insurers or companies should be allowed to use or share such data.

Indexed as

Delphi techniqueDigital data volumeExpert surveyHealthVulnerable groups

Identifiers

PMID40477250
PMCPMC8247614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.