ArticleZeitschrift fur Friedens- und Konfliktforschung2020
[The Covid19 pandemic in the nexus of biological weapons control, biosecurity and global health].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Covid19 pandemic can most likely be traced to a natural outbreak. Nevertheless, allegations that the novel corona virus was intentionally or accidentally released from a laboratory could exacerbate existing conflicts and tensions. The possession and use of biological weapons are prohibited by international law. The lack of transparency and of controls as well as legitimate biological research with high potential for misuse leave room for misinformation, misperceptions and suspicions, as has been the case with the Covid19 pandemic. Stronger mechanisms for verifying and investigating the bioweapons prohibition, stricter compliance procedures to deal with violations, and greater transparency for dual-use research of concern could help prevent biological attacks and contain negative political dynamics in case of unusual disease outbreaks. To that end, the Biological Weapons Convention would need to be strengthened, and the interplay of biological disarmament, biosecurity and global health would need to be more focussed. Having a clear division of labour and exploiting synergies, e.g. in health preparedness and in dealing with scientific and technological developments, would benefit both pandemic preparedness and biological disarmament.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.