Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476927›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2025

Prediction of Adolescent Suicide Attempt by Integrating Clinical, Neurocognitive and Geocoded Neighborhood Environment Data.

Elina Visoki, Tyler M Moore, Victor M Ruiz, Joel A Fein, Monica E Calkins, Ruben C Gur, Tami D Benton, Raquel E Gur, Fuchiang R Tsui, Ran Barzilay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elina VisokiDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Tyler M MooreLifespan Brain Institute of CHOP and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Victor M RuizDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PA, United States.
Joel A FeinEmergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Monica E CalkinsLifespan Brain Institute of CHOP and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0546-0263
Ruben C GurLifespan Brain Institute of CHOP and Penn Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Tami D BentonDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Raquel E GurDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Fuchiang R TsuiDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, PA, United States.
Ran BarzilayDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3247-2331

Funding

NIMH NIH HHS R21MH123916, K23MH120437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and hypothesisSuicide attempt is a complex behavior influenced by a combination of factors including clinical, neurocognitive, and environmental. We aimed to leverage multimodal data collected during pre/early adolescence in research settings to predict self-report of suicide attempts by mid-late adolescence reported in pediatric settings. We hypothesized that different data types contribute to suicide attempt prediction and that clinical features would be most predictive of future suicide attempts. STUDY

designWe applied machine learning methods to clinical, neurocognitive, and geocoded neighborhood environmental data from the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort study (Mean age [SD] = 11.1 [2.2], 53.3% female, 51.4% Black participants) to predict suicide attempt reported ~5 years later in two independent pediatric settings: primary care (n = 922, 5.3% suicide attempt) or emergency department (n = 497, 8.2% suicide attempt). We tested prediction performance using all data versus using subsets of features identified by three feature selection algorithms (Lasso, Relief, Random Forest). STUDY

resultsIn the primary care sample, suicide attempt prediction using subsets of selected features (predictors) was good, achieving AUC = 0.75, sensitivity/specificity 0.76/0.77. The use of highest-ranking features yielded similar prediction performance in external validation using the independent emergency department sample with AUC = 0.74, sensitivity/specificity 0.66/0.70. Different algorithms identified different high-ranking features, but overall multiple data domains were represented among the highest-ranking features. Besides suicidal ideation, the highest-ranking clinical predictive symptoms were from psychosis or mania spectrum.

conclusionsResults suggest that data collected at a single timepoint during preadolescence can inform suicide attempt prediction during mid-late adolescence, in different clinical settings. Findings encourage incorporation of multiple data types including neurocognitive and geocoded data, alongside clinical data, in machine learning suicide attempt prediction pipelines.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorEmergency Service, HospitalMachine LearningNeighborhood CharacteristicsPrimary Health CareSuicide, AttemptedAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMalePhiladelphiamachine learningpediatricspredictionpsychiatrysuicide attempt

Identifiers

PMID40476927
PMCPMC12236345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.