Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476908›Full record

ReviewSmart learning environments2023

Student engagement during emergency remote teaching: A scoping review.

Dong Yang, Huanhuan Wang, Ahmed Hosny Saleh Metwally, Ronghuai Huang

Full text readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Smart learning environments, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Student Dropout as a Never-Ending Evergreen Phenomenon of Online Distance Education.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dong YangSmart Learning Institute, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4862-7454
Huanhuan WangNational Engineering Research Center of Cyberlearning and Intelligent Technology (China), Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8979-2769
Ahmed Hosny Saleh MetwallySmart Learning Institute, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ronghuai HuangSmart Learning Institute, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on student engagement has recently gained popularity as it can address problems such as early dropout and poor achievement. The growing interest in investigating student engagement during the Covid-19 pandemic is reflected in increased publications addressing this topic. However, no review provided research evidence and an overview of existing literature on student engagement during emergency remote teaching (ERT). We reviewed how student engagement studies were undertaken during ERT from three perspectives: (1) the landscape of studies, (2) methodologies issues, and (3) the strategies used to facilitate student engagement. 42 articles were analysed from an initial pool of 436 search results. The findings illustrate that current studies were predominately undertaken in the United States (36%) and China (22%) with focusing on STEM subjects as a dominant discipline. The literature was largely inconsistent in defining and measuring student engagement. In addition, the majority of studies (57%) investigated students' engagement from the perspective of students, unlike other stakeholders. The most prominent finding is that ERT promoted several important engagement strategies, including motivational factors, teachers' facilitation, a hybrid learning model, and using learning technologies to boost students' engagement.

Indexed as

Covid-19Emergency remote teachingScoping reviewStudent engagementTeaching strategy

Identifiers

PMID40476908
PMCPMC10012281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
reference markers read18
measurements read47
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.