ArticleJournal of building engineering2023
Assessing the impact of architectural and behavioral interventions for controlling indoor COVID-19 infection risk: An agent-based approach.
Article in Journal of building engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring the impact of climate and air quality on COVID-19 transmission dynamics: a tale of two cities in pandemic preparedness.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Frost resistance improvement of recycled powder concrete by chemical admixtures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic changed our lives, forcing us to reconsider our built environment. In some buildings with high traffic flow, infected individuals release viral particles during movement. The complex interactions between humans, building, and viruses make it difficult to predict indoor infection risk by traditional computational fluid dynamics methods. The paper developed a spatially-explicit agent-based model to simulate indoor respiratory pathogen transmission for buildings with frequent movement of people. The social force model simulating pedestrian movement and a simple forcing method simulating indoor airflow were coupled in an agent-based modeling environment. The impact of architectural and behavioral interventions on the indoor infection risk was then compared by simulating a supermarket case. We found that wearing a mask was the most effective single intervention, with all people wearing masks reducing the percentage of infections to 0.08%. Among the combined interventions, the combination of customer control is the most effective and can reduce the percentage of infections to 0.04%. In addition, the extremely strict combination of all the interventions makes the supermarket free of new infections during its 8-h operation. The approach can help architects, managers, or the government better understand the effect of nonpharmaceutical interventions to reduce the infection risk and improve the level of indoor safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.