ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2026
Dissecting Sense of Agency in Schizophrenia: A Predictive Coding Perspective.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Errors or Adaptations? A Critical Review of Predictive Processing in Psychiatry.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and hypothesisA large body of literature suggests that neurocognitive processes underlying the sense of agency are disrupted in schizophrenia. We here tested the sense of agency in schizophrenia patients, by controlling for the potential confounding effect of temporal perception biases, antipsychotics, attentional-executive functioning, and illness duration. We also analyze the role of symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations, and passivity experiences. STUDY
designWe capitalized on the intentional binding phenomenon, an implicit measure of the sense of agency. 30 schizophrenia patients and 30 healthy controls completed 2 tasks. Experimental task participants pressed a switch to turn a light bulb on (active condition) or let their finger be moved by an automated switch (passive condition). They then judged the interval between the action (active or passive) and the lighting of the bulb. Control task participants estimated the time interval between two light flashes presented in sequence. All participants underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, while schizophrenia patients were also evaluated for positive, negative symptoms, and passivity symptoms. STUDY
resultsControl participants showed the expected intentional binding effect, particularly at shorter action-outcome delays. In contrast, the effect was absent in schizophrenia patients. The alteration was significantly moderated by temporal perception biases, hallucinations, and delusions.
conclusionsThe study provides the first evidence in favor of the relationship between agency disturbances, symptomatology, and temporal perception biases in schizophrenia while excluding putative confounding factors like neuroleptics. Results are discussed in the light of a recent predictive coding model of the sense of agency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.