Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476632›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2026

Genomic Evaluation in Nellore Cattle for Reproductive Traits: Multiple Ways to Account for Missing Pedigrees.

Larissa Temp, Gabriel Gubiani, Ludmilla Brunes, Claudio Magnabosco, Fernando Bussiman, Jorge Hidalgo, Daniela Lourenco, Fernando Baldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Larissa TempDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1003-7977
Gabriel GubianiDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3810-7319
Ludmilla BrunesCentro de Desempenho Animal, Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-520X
Claudio MagnaboscoCentro de Desempenho Animal, Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, Federal District, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7274-0134
Fernando BussimanDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5417-5816
Jorge HidalgoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0783-381X
Daniela LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3140-1002
Fernando BaldiDepartamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4094-2011

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2022/12134-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/08817-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing pedigrees are a common problem in most populations. Animals with unknown ancestors are usually treated as founders; however, this can underestimate inbreeding, not properly account for different base populations, and bias breeding values. We aimed to assess the use of unknown parent groups (UPG) or metafounders (MF) to model missing pedigrees in a beef cattle population. Phenotypic and genotypic data from the Nellore improvement programme of the Brazilian Breeders and Researchers Association were used. The pedigree contained 3.8 M animals born between 1970 and 2022, of which 51,752 were genotyped. Records for scrotal circumference at 365 days old (SC365, N = 239,806), age at first calving (AFC, N = 560,785) and accumulated cow productivity (ACP, N = 269,330) were used. Four models were implemented: single-step GBLUP without explicitly dealing with missing pedigree (G0), with UPG (G1), with MF (G2) and with

Indexed as

GenomicsPedigreeReproductionAnimalsBrazilBreedingCattleFemaleGene FrequencyGenotypeMaleModels, GeneticPhenotypeaccuracyBos indicusmetafoundersssGBLUPunknow parent groups

Identifiers

PMID40476632
PMCPMC12686765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.