ArticleHealth services research2026
Where Can Artificial Intelligence Assist Cancer Care?: Examining Patient-Centered Communication Dimension Effects.
Article in Health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Communication Barriers in Patient-Provider Interactions in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Where Can Artificial Intelligence Assist Cancer Care?: Examining Patient-Centered Communication Dimension Effects.Health services research · 2026Article
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for cancer diagnosis and prognosis prediction: current applications and emerging opportunities.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore how aspects of patient-centered communication (PCC) may directly or indirectly predict patients' preferences for artificial intelligences (AIs) versus human medical professionals, based on the stimulus-organism-response model. STUDY SETTING AND
designAs AI gains popularity and researchers explore its application in the medical context, it is important to understand how current patient-provider dynamics involving high technology (e.g., telehealth communication) may shape patients' perceptions of future use of AI, especially in the context of cancer care where patient satisfaction and sense of care continuity are important. Participants were recruited from an online panel in China (June 2024). Structural equation modeling analyzed the relationships among variables, including six PCC dimensions (i.e., exchanging information, fostering healing relationships, making decisions, managing uncertainty, responding to emotions, and enabling patient self-management), communication outcomes (i.e., patient satisfaction, sense of care continuity), and patients' preference of AIs vs. human medical professionals. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: Primary data were collected from an online panel of 495 Chinese cancer patients in China, representative of the gender and age distribution of the overall Chinese population due to quota sampling. PRINCIPAL
findingsDirect predictors of preference for replacing human medical professionals with AIs included lower patient satisfaction (β = -11, p < 0.05), lower ease of use (β = -0.1, p < 0.05), better care continuity (β = 0.15, p < 0.01), providers' attending to emotions (β = 0.17, p < 0.05), and less enablement in self-management (β = -0.17, p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction, ease of use, and care continuity mediated the relationships between different PCC dimensions and patients' preferences for AI use.
conclusionsPCC and communication outcomes are associated with cancer patients' preferences in future AI use. Our study sheds light on how clinicians may improve their communication to educate patients on navigating the cancer care continuum using AI technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.