ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
A Bayesian Approach to the G-Formula via Iterative Conditional Regression.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In longitudinal observational studies with time-varying confounders, the generalized computation algorithm formula (g-formula) is a principled tool to estimate the average causal effect of a treatment regimen. However, the standard non-iterative g-formula implementation requires specifying both the conditional distribution of the outcomes and the joint distribution of all time-varying covariates. This process can be cumbersome to implement and is prone to model misspecification bias. As an alternative, the iterative conditional expectation (ICE) g-formula estimator solely depends on a series of nested outcome regressions and avoids the need for specifying the full distribution of all time-varying covariates. This simplicity lends itself to the natural integration of flexible machine learning techniques to develop more robust average causal effect estimators with time-varying treatments. In this work, we introduce a Bayesian approach that includes parametric regressions and Bayesian Additive Regression Trees to flexibly model a series of outcome surfaces. We fit the ICE g-formula and develop a sampling algorithm to obtain samples from the posterior distribution of the final causal effect estimator. We illustrate the performance characteristics of the Bayesian ICE estimator and the associated variations via simulation studies and applications to two real world data examples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.