Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476263›Full record

ArticleCochrane evidence synthesis and methods2024

Development of a topic-specific bibliographic database supporting the updates of SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010.

Lasse Østengaard, Ariel Barrientos, Isabelle Boutron, An-Wen Chan, Gary Collins, Sally Hopewell, David Moher, Camilla Hansen Nejstgaard, Kenneth F Schulz, Benjamin Speich and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. [Interpretation and Examples: Key Updates in SPIRIT 2025 Statement].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  5. [Interpretation and Examples: Key Updates in CONSORT 2025].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Lasse ØstengaardDepartment of Clinical Research, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense (CEBMO) and Cochrane Denmark University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7033-3722
Ariel BarrientosTemerty School of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Isabelle BoutronCentre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS) Université Paris Cité, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE Paris France.
An-Wen ChanDepartment of Medicine, Women's College Research Institute University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Gary CollinsCentre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Sally HopewellOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit/Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.
David MoherClinical Epidemiology Program Centre for Journalology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Camilla Hansen NejstgaardDepartment of Clinical Research, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense (CEBMO) and Cochrane Denmark University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.
Kenneth F SchulzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA.
Benjamin SpeichOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit/Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Evan TangFaculty of Medicine University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Ruth TunnOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit/Centre for Statistics in Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Nozomi WatanabeCardiovascular European Research Center (CERC) Massy France.
Chenchen XuClinical Epidemiology Program Centre for Journalology, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada.
Asbjørn HróbjartssonDepartment of Clinical Research, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense (CEBMO) and Cochrane Denmark University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: An important mechanism of research waste is inadequate incorporation of, and references to, previous relevant research. Identifying references for a research manuscript can be challenging, in part due to the exponential rise in potentially relevant literature to consider. For large research projects, such as developing or updating reporting guidelines, it may be helpful to construct a supportive topic-specific bibliographic database. Methods: In support of updating the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 and the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010, we developed the SPIRIT-CONSORT Evidence Bibliographic database (SCEBdb): a freely available topic-specific bibliographic database of publications providing an evidence foundation for the updates. We searched multiple sources of potential publications and tagged included ones with database-specific keywords. For context, we also formulated 10 core considerations for constructing topic-specific bibliographic databases and identified and described 5 illustrative other databases. Results: As of April 2024, the SCEBdb included 846 publications. The database proved useful as a supplementary information source for our scoping review of published comments on SPIRIT 2013 and CONSORT 2010, for a supplementary Delphi process, and in the writing phase of the guidance documents. We expect that the database will be useful for future projects within the fields of clinical research methodology, bias, evidence synthesis, and randomized trials. Conclusion: The methods involved in constructing the SCEBdb, and our suggested core considerations for topic-specific bibliographic databases, could be helpful for researchers reflecting on whether, and how, to develop a topic-specific bibliographic database.

Indexed as

bibliographic databaseCONSORT (CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials)reporting guidelinesSPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials)

Identifiers

PMID40476263
PMCPMC11795946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.