ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025
MAGGIC risk score and drug-related adverse events of sacubitril/valsartan: Insights from the REVIEW-HF registry.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score is a validated mortality risk tool in heart failure (HF), its utility in assessing drug-related adverse events (DAEs) associated with sacubitril/valsartan initiation remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between the MAGGIC risk score and DAEs related to sacubitril/valsartan initiation in a Japanese multicenter cohort. Methods: We analyzed 787 patients with HF initiated on sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg/day between August 2020 and August 2021. Patients were stratified into tertiles based on MAGGIC risk scores. The primary outcome was DAEs within 90 days of initiation, defined as hypotension, hyperkalemia, renal events, or angioedema. Secondary outcomes included drug discontinuation and clinical outcomes. Results: DAEs occurred in 22.7 % patients. Higher MAGGIC risk scores were significantly associated with increased DAEs (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for highest vs. lowest tertile: 2.64, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.66-4.25, p for trend < 0.001) and sacubitril/valsartan discontinuation (21.3 % of patients; adjusted OR for highest vs. lowest tertile: 2.68, 95 % CI: 1.69-4.32, p for trend < 0.001). Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analyses revealed that the association between DAEs and clinical outcomes varied across the MAGGIC risk score tertiles, with significant interactions between the composite outcome and hospitalization for HF, particularly in lower-risk groups. Conclusions: The MAGGIC risk score was associated with DAEs risk following sacubitril/valsartan initiation in patients with HF. The impact of DAEs on outcomes varied across risk tertiles, suggesting potential utility for risk stratification and monitoring approaches in HF management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.