Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476169›Full record

ArticleMedical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran2024

The Association between Oligohydramnios and the Risk of Malpresentation: A Meta-Analysis.

Maryam Nurzadeh, Mahsa Naemi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maryam NurzadehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-4992
Mahsa NaemiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-0688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus on the role of oligohydramnios on the increased risk of fetal malpresentation. Therefore, we decided, for the first time, to collect all published studies on this topic to synthesize all available data through a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of oligohydramnios on the increased risk of fetal malpresentation. Methods: A search was done in the following international electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus to April 2021. Heterogeneity among studies was determined by the Q-test and I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed by Begg and Egger tests. The results were reported using odds ratio (OR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. Data were analyzed using Stata software Version 14 (StataCorp). Results: The meta-analysis identified 431 articles, comprising 227,351 participants, exploring the link between oligohydramnios and malpresentation. A significant association was found (OR, 1.79 [95% CI, 1.42-2.15]), indicating that oligohydramnios increases the risk of malpresentation. The analysis also revealed substantial heterogeneity among the included studies (I² = 80.2%; Conclusion: This meta-analysis provides robust evidence that oligohydramnios is a significant risk factor for fetal malpresentation. These findings underscore the critical importance of monitoring amniotic fluid levels during pregnancy. The results suggest that healthcare providers should prioritize the assessment of amniotic fluid volume in pregnant patients, especially those presenting with risk factors for oligohydramnios.

Indexed as

MalpresentationMeta-analysisOligohydramniosPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID40476169
PMCPMC12138669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.