ReviewBrain & spine2025
Artificial intelligence and chordoma: A scoping review of the current landscape and future directions.
Review in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive tumours that present significant treatment challenges due to their proximity to critical neurovascular structures. Artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies have shown promise in enhancing diagnostic precision, surgical planning, and prognostication in various cancers. Research question: What is the current landscape of AI applications in chordoma management, and what are the key limitations and future directions for integrating AI into clinical practice for this rare malignancy? Materials and methods: We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the Arksey and O'Malley framework. A search of five databases with an end date of November 9, 2024, identified peer-reviewed studies assessing AI or machine learning applications in chordoma management. Data extraction focused on study characteristics, methodologies, clinical tasks, and performance metrics. Results: Twenty-one studies published between 2017 and 2024 were included, encompassing 5486 patients. The studies addressed diverse clinical tasks: 7 focused on differentiating chordomas from other tumours or classifying subtypes, 6 on survival prediction, 2 on tumour segmentation, 2 on outcome prediction, and 4 miscellaneous tasks. Common algorithms used included convolutional neural networks, support vector machines, random forests, and clustering algorithms. Limitations identified across studies included small sample sizes, single-center data, reliance on single data modalities, and issues with model interpretability. Discussion and conclusion: AI applications in chordoma management show potential in improving diagnostic accuracy, surgical planning, and prognostication. Future research should focus on collaborative efforts for larger, diverse datasets with external validation cohorts, interpretable multimodal models, and validation through prospective clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.