ArticleBrain & spine2025
Visual hallucinations in neurosurgery: A systematic review and two case insights into Charles Bonnet Syndrome.
Article in Brain & spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reversible visual pareidolia and ictal bradykinesia associated with a left parieto-occipital cavernous malformation: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2026Article
- Beyond Charles Bonnet Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Psychotic Symptoms in Vision Loss.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Review
- Complex Visual and Auditory Hallucinations Following Neurosurgical Injury: A Case Series and Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- The impact of an educational podcast on emotional wellbeing and attitudes towards Charles Bonnet syndrome hallucinations.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Visual disturbances in brain tumor patients occur as a direct consequence of tumor location or as a complication after surgery. These can range from minor vision changes to severe impairments, including visual hallucinations. Research question: Charles Bonnet Syndrome (CBS) is an underrecognized cause of complex visual hallucinations in patients with visual system disorders, particularly following neurosurgical interventions. We present two cases of CBS following neurosurgical procedures, recruited from our department. Materials and methods: Detailed patient histories, neurological and ophthalmologic evaluations, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computerized perimetry, electroencephalogram (EEG), and psychiatric assessments were conducted. A systematic literature review was also performed, focusing on CBS in the context of neurosurgery. Results: The literature review included 13 studies with 17 patients diagnosed with CBS related to neurosurgery. The average age was 54.8 ± 16.5 years. CBS was associated with various pathologies, including mesial temporal lobe sclerosis, glial tumors, and pituitary adenomas. Most CBS cases (76 %) developed post-surgery. CBS onset was linked to extra-axial tumors causing direct mechanical compression of the optic chiasma or nerve, which often resolved completely after tumor excision. Intra-axial tumors were more likely to cause CBS post-operatively, likely due to surgical trauma affecting the optic tracts or visual cortex, and often required additional treatment. Discussion and conclusion: CBS is frequently underrecognized in neurosurgical patients. Differentiating between extra-axial and intra-axial tumor involvement is critical for appropriate treatment. Standardized diagnostic and treatment protocols are needed to improve outcomes, and further research is essential to better understand CBS mechanisms in neurosurgical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.