ArticleCureus2025
Spencer Technique of the Hip Demonstrates Equivocal Changes in Hip Range of Motion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context Hip range of motion plays a crucial role in the functional health of runners. Osteopathic manipulative treatment has historically been used to maintain or restore a joint's range of motion; therefore, this study investigates how the Spencer technique impacts femoroacetabular active range of motion in runners. Objective This study investigated the impact that the bilateral Spencer technique has on all planes of hip motion. Methods Forty participants were randomly divided into treatment and control groups, with the treatment group receiving twice-weekly bilateral Spencer technique for four weeks and the control group receiving no treatment. Both groups were instructed to train as they normally would for the four weeks leading up to a five-kilometer (5K) race. Measurements of hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction were taken to assess the percent change in range of motion over the course of training, as well as before and after the race, for all planes of motion in treatment vs control groups. Results The only significant difference in average percent change in range of motion for control (n=19) vs treatment groups (n=20) across both treatment and race periods was found for abduction wherein the control group experienced an average change of +7.09% (standard deviation of 17.38%) and the treatment group experienced an average change of -5.58% (standard deviation of 17.48%) for a difference of 12.67% (p=0.03). All other findings for all other motions across both training and race periods showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion This study found that four weeks of twice-weekly treatment with the Spencer technique of the hip had no statistically significant impact on change in hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction across the four weeks when compared to control. When analyzing the impact of this treatment on the change of these motions across a 5K race occurring at the end of the four weeks, this study found that the Spencer technique of the hip had a statistically significant negative impact on abduction, compared to the control. These findings bring into question the role that the Spencer technique of the hip may have for healthy individuals training for athletic competition and open the door for future research to analyze the effect that this osteopathic technique has on motion in a setting that better controls for differences in training habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.