Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476131›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Spencer Technique of the Hip Demonstrates Equivocal Changes in Hip Range of Motion.

Jesse O'Rorke, Zachary J Buchman, Vincent R Savarino, Jason S DeFrancisis, Cameron S Guay, Brianna Bushman, Benjamin M Vinarski, James Toldi, Rebecca E Steiner, David Boesler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jesse O'RorkeOsteopathic Medicine, Lee Health, Fort Myers, USA.
Zachary J BuchmanSchool of Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, Florida, USA.
Vincent R SavarinoInternal Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Jason S DeFrancisisOrthopedic Surgery, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Cameron S GuayOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Brianna BushmanOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
Benjamin M VinarskiMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Miami, USA.
James ToldiSports Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine, Orange Park, USA.
Rebecca E SteinerMedicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.
David BoeslerOsteopathic Medicine, Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Bradenton, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context Hip range of motion plays a crucial role in the functional health of runners. Osteopathic manipulative treatment has historically been used to maintain or restore a joint's range of motion; therefore, this study investigates how the Spencer technique impacts femoroacetabular active range of motion in runners. Objective This study investigated the impact that the bilateral Spencer technique has on all planes of hip motion.  Methods Forty participants were randomly divided into treatment and control groups, with the treatment group receiving twice-weekly bilateral Spencer technique for four weeks and the control group receiving no treatment. Both groups were instructed to train as they normally would for the four weeks leading up to a five-kilometer (5K) race. Measurements of hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction were taken to assess the percent change in range of motion over the course of training, as well as before and after the race, for all planes of motion in treatment vs control groups. Results The only significant difference in average percent change in range of motion for control (n=19) vs treatment groups (n=20) across both treatment and race periods was found for abduction wherein the control group experienced an average change of +7.09% (standard deviation of 17.38%) and the treatment group experienced an average change of -5.58% (standard deviation of 17.48%) for a difference of 12.67% (p=0.03). All other findings for all other motions across both training and race periods showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). Conclusion This study found that four weeks of twice-weekly treatment with the Spencer technique of the hip had no statistically significant impact on change in hip flexion, extension, internal rotation, external rotation, abduction, and adduction across the four weeks when compared to control. When analyzing the impact of this treatment on the change of these motions across a 5K race occurring at the end of the four weeks, this study found that the Spencer technique of the hip had a statistically significant negative impact on abduction, compared to the control. These findings bring into question the role that the Spencer technique of the hip may have for healthy individuals training for athletic competition and open the door for future research to analyze the effect that this osteopathic technique has on motion in a setting that better controls for differences in training habits.

Indexed as

athletic performanceomt in sportorthopedic sports medicineosteopathic manipulative medicinespencer technique of the hip

Identifiers

PMID40476131
PMCPMC12140400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.