ArticleCureus2025
Clinical Evaluation of Composite Restorations Using the Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) Criteria: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study at University Dental Hospital, The University of Lahore, Pakistan.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Versus Incremental Composite Placement Approaches in Vital Posterior Teeth: A 24 Months Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDental restorations play a very important role in maintaining oral function and aesthetics. However, the restoration's longevity is influenced by various factors, including material properties, classification of cavities, and clinical performance over time. Understanding why the restorations fail is essential not only for better treatment results but also for improving their longevity. The Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) criteria provide a detailed framework for assessing restoration performance in functional, biological, and aesthetic aspects.
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate clinical success and failure rates using FDI criteria for dental restorations based on tooth location, cavity type, and restoration duration.
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional clinical evaluation was conducted on 230 restored teeth in patients treated with permanent composite restoration. Restorations were grouped by location (anterior or posterior), duration (≤6 months, >6-12 months, >1-3 years, >3-5 years, >5 years), and cavity classification (Classes I-V). Functional (fracture of material and retention, marginal adaptation, proximal contact point), biological (caries at restoration margin, dental hard tissue defects, post-operative sensitivity), and aesthetic (surface luster and texture, color match, marginal staining) parameters were evaluated. A statistical analysis was conducted using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS, version 25; IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Armonk, NY) to determine significant differences.
resultsThe overall success rate was 30% (n=69), while 70% (n=161) experienced failure. Success rates were comparable between anterior (29.2%, n=14) and posterior teeth (30.2%, n=55). Class I restorations had the highest success rate (42.4%, n=36), whereas Class V restorations showed the lowest (11.1%, n=1), with a statistically significant association between cavity classification and restoration longevity (p=0.012). Restoration success declined over time, with those exceeding five years showing the highest failure rate (81.5%, n=22). Functional evaluation showed a decline in fracture resistance and marginal adaptation over time, while biological assessment revealed an increase in secondary caries. Aesthetic factors, including color match and marginal staining, also worsened with time.
conclusionRestoration longevity is influenced by cavity classification and duration of the restoration, with Class I restorations exhibiting superior durability. The findings emphasize the progressive decline in functional, biological, and aesthetic properties over time, stressing the need for improved restorative materials and techniques to enhance long-term success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.