ArticleRespiratory medicine case reports2025
Asymptomatic sigmoid diverticulum perforation-induced subcutaneous, mediastinal, and retroperitoneal emphysema: A case report and literature review.
Article in Respiratory medicine case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mediastinal and subcutaneous emphysema usually result from spontaneous rupture of the alveolar wall. We present an educational case of subcutaneous, mediastinal, and retroperitoneal emphysema discovered during a routine medical check-up resulting from an asymptomatic perforation of the sigmoid diverticulum. Case presentation: A 66-year-old man presented to our hospital for his health check-up. A chest X-ray revealed mediastinal emphysema during a physical examination. The patient had no subjective symptoms, fever, or hemodynamic instability. Physical examination revealed a snow grip sensation in the anterior neck but no abdominal tenderness. Blood tests showed an elevated inflammatory response, and a plain chest computed tomography scan revealed subcutaneous emphysema around the neck, as well as mediastinal and retroperitoneal emphysema. The patient was then admitted to the hospital and the patient was treated conservatively. On Day 7 post-admission, the emphysema was mildly relieved. However, on Day 10, the patient developed intestinal obstruction caused by barium. Colonoscopy revealed sigmoid colon perforation. On Day 11, partial resection of the sigmoid colon via laparotomy and colostomy (Hartmann operation) was performed. Postoperative pathology revealed a perforation of the sigmoid colon, which was confirmed to be induced by diverticulitis, as multiple diverticula were simultaneously found in the sigmoid colon. Conclusions: Even in the absence of abdominal symptoms, retroperitoneal emphysema may develop due to perforation of the sigmoid colon. Therefore, if retroperitoneal emphysema is combined with mediastinal emphysema, evaluation, including abdominal CT, should be performed to identify the cause of emphysema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.