Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476069›Full record

ArticlePlant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)2025

How to Test for Seed Mucilage to Examine an Age-Old Question: A Response to Ladwig and Lucas (2024).

E F LoPresti, J M Cowley, S N Gorb, A Kreitschitz

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E F LoPrestiUniversity of South Carolina Columbia South Carolina USA.
J M CowleySchool of Agriculture, Food, and Wine University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia.
S N GorbKiel University Zoological Institute Kiel University Kiel Germany.
A KreitschitzUniversity of Wroclaw Wroclaw Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traits of seeds are far less-studied than those of vegetative plants, despite the importance of this stage in a plant's life cycle. Much research has demonstrated the importance of certain aspects of seed phenotype, including both chemical and physical traits, to survival in the face of biotic and abiotic selective pressures. One trait with demonstrated physiological and defensive functionality is seed mucilage. This persistent hydrogel coating on the surface of the seed is extremely common and found in thousands of species across angiosperms, with many independent evolutionary origins. Despite attention in taxonomic, floristic, ecological, and biomaterial investigations for over a century, and the economic importance of products derived from this mucilage, the trait is often overlooked, and protocols for the labs determining seed mucilage across plants vary. Here, in response to a paper claiming seed mucilage in many new species due to flawed methodology, we lay out specific protocols to determine the presence of mucilage, in an effort to standardize across studies. We hope these methods prove useful in both evaluating the current literature and permit cross-study comparisons to advance the study of this important trait.

Identifiers

PMID40476069
PMCPMC12138573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.