ReviewJournal of orthopaedic translation2025
Sex-dependent variation in bone adaptation: from degeneration to regeneration.
Review in Journal of orthopaedic translation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and internal validation of a diagnostic prediction model for osteoporosis in elderly people living with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy: a cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Engineering multifunctional microspheres for sequential regulation of osteoimmune microenvironment and bone remodeling balance to promote regeneration of osteoporotic bone defects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Article
- Deep Learning-Based Assessment of the Value of Vertebral Structural Parameters in Predicting Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures on Opportunistic CT Scans.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- "Multidisciplinary synergy driving innovation in orthopaedic translational medicine".Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Challenges and limitations in developing of a new maxillary standardized rat alveolar bone defect model to study bone regenerative approaches in oral and maxillofacial surgery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Sexual dimorphism in LC-MS/MS-based vitamin D metabolite profiling and nutrition-acquired biochemical osteomalacia among adolescents.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While known sex differences in bone health exist, scientific studies on bone degeneration and regeneration frequently disregard sex impact as a variable in outcomes. Evidence has established a higher risk of osteoporosis and increased bone degradation rates in women when compared to men. Accumulating research suggests that this disparity is also present in bone regeneration and repair. However, no comprehensive review highlighting the influence of sex currently exists in this field. This paper aims to review the information presently available on the cellular mechanisms behind skeletal sexual dimorphism specific to hormones and bone's degenerative and regenerative sex differences. This review will discuss the optimization of personalized regenerative therapies accounting for sex. The review emphasizes that sex impact must further be investigated to advance the field of bone regeneration and improve patient outcomes and quality of life. As translational medicine is JOT's focus, authors must highlight the translational potential or clinical significance of their work in both the abstract and the discussion. To this effect, it is required to include a statement following the abstract (included in the abstract word count) under the following heading: "The Translational Potential of this Article". 2. Please re-edit the reference list according to the following guidelines: 1) The last names and initials of all the authors up to 6 should be included, but when authors number 7 or more, list the first 6 authors only followed by 'et al'; 2) The "[eng]" in the reference list should be removed (if any); 3) Reference to a standard journal article (Please pay particular attention to the formatting, word capitalization, spacing and style): "Niemansburg SL, van Delden JJ, Dhert WJ, Bredenoord AL. Regenerative medicine interventions for orthopedic disorders: ethical issues in the translation into patients. Regen Med 2013;8:65-73.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.