Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476050›Full record

ArticleStatistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics2025

On the Use of Auxiliary Variables in Multilevel Regression and Poststratification.

Yajuan Si

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. On the Use of Auxiliary Variables in Multilevel Regression and Poststratification.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Smoothed model-assisted small area estimation of proportions.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yajuan SiUniversity of Michigan.

Funding

Statistical adjustments of sample representation in community-level estimates of COVID-19 transmission and immunityU01MD017867 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SI, YAJUAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
Novel Approaches to Adjusting for Population Heterogeneity and Representation in Neuroimaging StudiesR21HD105204 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SI, YAJUAN · 2021 to 2022
$400k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD105204NIMHD NIH HHS U01 MD017867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multilevel regression and poststratification (MRP) is a popular method for addressing selection bias in subgroup estimation, with broad applications across fields from social sciences to public health. In this paper, we examine the inferential validity of MRP in finite populations, exploring the impact of poststratification and model specification. The success of MRP relies heavily on the availability of auxiliary information that is strongly related to the outcome. To enhance the fitting performance of the outcome model, we recommend modeling the inclusion probabilities conditionally on auxiliary variables and incorporating flexible functions of estimated inclusion probabilities as predictors in the mean structure. We present a statistical data integration framework that offers robust inferences for probability and nonprobability surveys, addressing various challenges in practical applications. Our simulation studies indicate the statistical validity of MRP, which involves a tradeoff between bias and variance, with greater benefits for subgroup estimates with small sample sizes, compared to alternative methods. We have applied our methods to the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, which collected information on children across 21 geographic locations in the U.S. to provide national representation, but is subject to selection bias as a nonprobability sample. We focus on the cognition measure of diverse groups of children in the ABCD study and show that the use of auxiliary variables affects the findings on cognitive performance.

Indexed as

data integrationmodel-basednonprobability samplerobust inferenceselection/nonresponse bias

Identifiers

PMID40476050
PMCPMC12140408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.