Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40476049›Full record

ArticleLancet regional health. Americas2025

Twenty years of breast cancer epidemiology and treatment patterns in S

Haydee Verduzco-Aguirre, Fernanda Mallucelli Favorito, Fabio Ynoe de Moraes, Gustavo Marta, Camila Tagle, Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos, André Mattar, Brooke E Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haydee Verduzco-AguirreDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Fernanda Mallucelli FavoritoFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabio Ynoe de MoraesDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Gustavo MartaHospital Sirio-Libanes Bela Vista, Brazil.
Camila TagleInstituto Nacional del Cáncer, Santiago, Chile.
Carlos Henrique Dos AnjosHospital Sirio-Libanes Bela Vista, Brazil.
André MattarOncoclínicas São Paulo, Hospital da Mulher São Paulo, Brazil.
Brooke E WilsonDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Over half of new breast cancer cases occur in low- and middle-income countries, with disparities in survival outcomes due to late-stage diagnoses, healthcare access gaps, and biological differences. This retrospective cohort study examined trends in survival, stage distribution, and treatment utilization for breast cancer in Brazil, an upper middle-income country. Methods: Patients newly diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 2000 and 2019 were identified from São Paulo's Oncocenter Foundation registry. Data on demographics, diagnosis stage, diagnosis-to-treatment intervals, and treatments received were analyzed in 5-year blocks. Median overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Actual treatment utilization was compared to model-based estimates of optimal utilization derived from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines' Enhanced and Maximal Resource Modules. Findings: We included 125,005 patients, with a median age at diagnosis of 55 years (interquartile range 46-75); 99.4% (n = 124,218) were female. The proportion with early disease remained stable over time (61.7% in 2000-2004, 62.4% 2015-2019). Median overall survival increased from 10.7 years (2000-2004) to 11.7 years (2010-2014); median survival for 2015-2019 was not reached. Median overall survival was 20.8, 15.1, 6.8, and 2.0 years for stages I-IV, respectively. Median diagnosis-to-treatment interval more than doubled over time. From 2000 to 2004 to 2015-2019, chemotherapy use decreased from 71.5% to 68.9%; radiotherapy use decreased from 64.0% to 56.5%, and surgery utilization decreased from 80.3% to 74.8%; endocrine therapy use varied between 54% and 62%. Gaps between observed and model-based estimates of treatment utilization were seen across all stages. Interpretation: Overall survival in patients with breast cancer in São Paulo has improved over time. However, significant treatment gaps and increasing diagnosis-to-treatment intervals suggest systemic barriers to optimal care delivery. Funding: No funding received.

Indexed as

Breast cancerChemotherapyEndocrine treatmentEpidemiologyGuideline concordanceHealth policyRadiationSurgery

Identifiers

PMID40476049
PMCPMC12135424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.